[pe2-image src=”https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/-Ex7o904GEV0\/Vt-ljPEh-II\/AAAAAAAAAts\/SkZKhnZmbQk\/s144-c-o\/20160308_1531%252520Sanders%252520Has%252520A%252520Much%252520More%252520Practical%252520Plan%252520Than%252520Clinton%252520%252528Forbes%252529.jpg” href=”https:\/\/picasaweb.google.com\/102930737536139888016\/Campaign2016#6259904031827818626″ caption=”Sanders Has A Much More Practical Plan Than Clinton To Raise Taxes On Richby Howard Gleckman, CONTRIBUTOR(MAR. 8, 2016 15:31) — Let\u2019s say you\u2019re a Democrat who wants to raise taxes on rich people. It turns out there are two very different ways to do it: The direct, simple, in-your-face Bernie Sanders version and the indirect, complicated, back-door Hillary Clinton model. http:\/\/publicskeleton.com\/media\/?p=634″ type=”image” alt=”20160308_1531 Sanders Has A Much More Practical Plan Than Clinton (Forbes).jpg” ] Sanders Has A Much More Practical Plan Than Clinton To Raise Taxes On Rich
\nby Howard Gleckman, CONTRIBUTOR<\/p>\n
(MAR. 8, 2016 15:31) — Let\u2019s say you\u2019re a Democrat who wants to raise taxes on rich people. It turns out there are two very different ways to do it: The direct, simple, in-your-face Bernie Sanders version and the indirect, complicated, back-door Hillary Clinton model.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m not talking about the magnitude of their respective tax proposals. That\u2019s a whole different story. This is really about the best way to structure tax increases, assuming you want to enact them at all. And by that measure, Sanders has the far better model.<\/p>\n