Epsteingate: Trump following Nixon Watergate Playbook in Jeffrey Epstein Client List Scandal

WASHINGTON, D.C. (July 14, 2024) – In Watergate, Nixon tried covering up how he and other high officials in the Nixon administration organized and paid operatives with campaign donations to break into the Democratic National Committee HQ to plant listening devices. The operatives were caught and arrested leading to a criminal investigation and the Washington Post writers Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward to investigate further.

In Watergate, Nixon, like Trump, (See Oliver Stone’s movie Nixon), became infuriated why people were paying attention to, or looking deeper into, the Watergate break-in. Meanwhile, the investigations continued to uncover tiny bits of evidence proving who was involved, including Nixon himself.

To try and deflect attention away from Watergate, Nixon tried minimizing the situation. Calling it petty, or trivial,and old news. It was clear Nixon was upset as to how everyone was talking about the Watergate break-in.

The break-in, as well as the obstruction and coverup by Nixon was nicknamed Watergate after the name of the hotel where the break-in occurred at in Washington, DC.

Since, other political scandals added the term “gate” to the end of a key term in the scandal. Trump has accumulated a number of -gate analogies to include Blabbergate, Bleachgate, Faceliftgate, Pussygate, Russiagate and Ukrainegate. We can now add Epsteingate to that list.

Like Trump in Espteingate, Nixon tried desperately to change the conversation away from the Watergate scandal. Nixon used similar methods now seen used by Trump such as trying to overstate various feets and accomplishments the Trump administration had made.

Similar to what Trump is doing now, Nixon, vilified anyone pointing a finger or critizing him or his administration regarding Watergate.

Nonetheless, the Watergate criminal investigation in the courts, as well as in media, all persisted and kept a slow but steady trickle of incriminated evidence which eventually turned into an avalanche.

Eventually, Nixon chose to resigned rather than give up personal recordings he made during meetings with his inncer circle in the oval office.

In Watergate, there was also gaps in various recordings that Nixon was compelled to release. Much like the gaps of the video surveillance footage of Jeffrey Epstein’s final night in custody and just before he was found dead in his cell from an apparent suicide.

These gaps in Nixon’s audio recorded meetings, as well as those found in the video recording of Epsteins final hours in custody were then for Nixon and are now for Trump an ongoing and highly debated topic of discussion and center of various conspiracy theories regarding Epsteins alledged suicide in jail while in solitary confinement.

Here, in Epsteingate, the sex trafficking Epstein case files, recordings, and other information seized from a private island and other sources are the issue.

It is presumed, and has been intimated by Attorney General Bondi, the evidence contained information purported to create a “client list” of wealthy, high ranking individuals who used Epstein’s sex services to gain access to underaged girls.

In Watergate, a key threat to Nixon was a former CIA agent Howard Hunt. Hunt was arrested as one of the burglars in Watergate. Hunt eventually threatened and turned against Nixon, extorting Nixon for money to keep quite about what he new of the Watergate break-in.

Here, Musk has turned against Trump making allegations that Trump is in the Epstein files. Fanning the flames of interest by the media and public.

Like Nixon, Trump continues to attempt to diffuse the Epstein client list scandal. Trump has tried to silence the matter by “telling” the media and the public to stop talking about the Epstein files.

Trump can also be seen using more dramatic tactics to change the focus off Epstein by talking about his accomplishments while in office such as tariff deals and negotiations between Israel, Iran, Russia and Ukraine.

Nixon, had the Vietnam war while Trump has the Israel/Iran and Russia/Ukraine wars at his disposal to try to redirect the public’s attention from the Epstein files. Trump has recently taunted a military conflict with Russia by directly indicating the US would send Patriot missles to Ukraine which in turn will be used against Russia.

Both Watergate and Epsteingate have followed similar paths by each of their respective administrations to hide the truth from official investigations, investigative journalists, the media at large and members of the general public.

Time will tell how long Trump can avoid disclosure of the Epstein files.

The primary piece of evidence sought pertains to an illusive “Client List” Epstein maintained as insurance or perhaps a “get out of jail free” card should Epstein have to face the law regarding sex trafficking charges.

In any case, a key inside player, now ousted from Trump’s inner circle is Elon Musk. A player similar to Hunt in the Nixon Watergate scandal.

Musk had access to classified information, or at least inside information regarding FBI, and other agency information pertaining to various offices in the government. Musk job running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) granted him access to this information.

Musk’s access to this information bolsters his claims that Trump is in the Epstein files. Musk has posted specific allegations on his platform X (formerly twitter), as well as posted photographs of Trump and Epstein together.

As a formidable foe in this saga, Musk has the financial and other resources to fend off retaliatory actions anticipated by Trump.

Trump has already threatened Musk’s citizenship, A political weapon Trump has used repetitively and recently against Rosie O’Donnell.
Citizenship revocation is a recuring weapon Trump has used to counterattack those who critize how he run’s the government.

Given Musk’s wealth, it is suggested he should offer $1M for information leading to the Epstein client list.

However, should Trump’s back be pushed against the wall, it is unlikely he will simply just resign. He may first attempt to pardon himself and those involved first, before resorting to Nixon’s strategy of resigning from the presidency to avoid accoutability for his actions.

EpsteinGate: Jeffrey Epstein Saga is Trump’s Watergate

WASHINGTON, D.C. (July 11, 2025) – With all of the ploys to distract, missdirect, avoid, delay and obstruct the onslought of requests for information by media and members of the public regarding Donald Trump’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein the matter has now turned into Trump’s Watergate – Epsteingate.

Yet, with all the lies and not so undercover covering-up, it is highly unlikely Trump, will resign from the presidency of the United States like the original Watergate scandal center piece, former president Nixon.

Oh no, in fact, Trump may even invite the chaos associated with pardoning himself. Much like the chaos of the January 6 riots on the Capitol.

Should anything come of Epsteingate, we wont need the vice president to pardon Trump.

Trump will pardon himself.

What would Jesus say about Donald Trump

Transcript

0:00
Hey there folks. Hope you’re doing well
0:01
today. You know, I left for 2,000 years.
0:06
I come back and somehow my biggest
0:08
followers are obsessed with a golden
0:11
idol who builds towers, cheats on his
0:13
wives, and brags about it on live TV.
0:17
Evangelicals,
0:19
what happened? I turned water into wine.
0:23
You turned scripture into a tax shelter
0:25
for billionaires. I said, “Love your
0:28
neighbor.” You said, “Build a wall.” And
0:32
then handed the hammer to a guy who paid
0:34
hush money to a porn star while his
0:36
third wife was home with a newborn. I
0:39
healed the sick for free. He tried to
0:42
strip health care from 30 million people
0:44
and called it a win. I fed the poor with
0:48
loaves and fishes. He fed the rich with
0:52
tax cuts and called the poor lazy. And
0:55
yet I’m the one you stopped inviting to
0:57
church. Trump once held a Bible upside
1:00
down in front of St. John’s Church like
1:02
it was a weapon. He didn’t read it. He
1:04
didn’t open it. Pretty sure he thinks
1:06
Corinthians is a hotel chain. But you
1:10
cheered. You cheered when he tear gas
1:12
protesters so he could take a photo.
1:14
Then you called it defending
1:16
Christianity. Let’s talk morality. You
1:19
used to say character counts. Then he
1:22
bragged about grabbing women by the
1:23
And your response was, “Well,
1:25
King David was flawed, too.” Oh, I know,
1:28
David. He wrote songs. Trump writes mean
1:32
tweets at 2 a.m. in adult diapers. I
1:35
preached, “Turn the other cheek.” He
1:38
said, “Punch him in the face and I’ll
1:39
pay your legal fees.” I said, “Blessed
1:42
are the meek.” He said, “Only losers and
1:45
suckers get buried in war.”
1:48
I told you not to store up treasures on
1:50
Earth. He stores them in Mara Lago
1:53
bathrooms next to classified documents
1:55
and Diet Coke. And you still defend him.
1:58
You call him God’s instrument. Well, if
2:00
God ever used an instrument that
2:02
bankrupt four casinos and couldn’t spell
2:04
Bible, it wasn’t for music. You think I
2:08
care if he stands with Israel? I’m from
2:10
Nazareth. That’s literally next door. I
2:14
was brown, Middle Eastern, broke, and
2:17
unarmed. By today’s standards, you’d
2:20
have called ICE on me and said I was
2:22
part of Hamas. Let’s not pretend you’re
2:24
defending me. You’re defending power,
2:27
comfort, control, and maybe a time share
2:30
in the rapture. You talk about family
2:32
values, but you backed a man who mocked
2:35
a war widow, called Haiti a hole,
2:38
and told four women of color in Congress
2:40
to go back to where they came from.
2:43
One of them is from Detroit.
2:46
You wanted prayer in schools. Fine. But
2:50
when kids prayed for their lives during
2:52
school shootings, he sold more guns and
2:54
blamed video games. And the worst part,
2:58
you know, deep down, you know, he
3:00
doesn’t believe any of it. He’s not one
3:02
of you. He’s not pretending anymore. He
3:06
just figured out how to sell Jesus like
3:07
a hat. He traded me in for a con man
3:10
wrapped in a flag holding a Bible like
3:13
it’s a menu at Denny’s. I didn’t die for
3:16
this. I died for the poor, the
3:19
oppressed, the outcasts. The same people
3:22
you now call crisis actors and illegals.
3:25
And let’s not forget the golden rule.
3:27
Treat others like you’d like to be
3:29
treated. Unless they’re gay or trans or
3:32
immigrants, then suddenly it’s religious
3:34
liberty to treat them like garbage.
3:37
Uh, Trump Tower, how poetic. A name
3:40
built on sand, pride, and unpaid
3:43
contractors. You didn’t crucify me this
3:45
time. You just branded me. And when the
3:47
poor cry out, when the refugees beg for
3:50
mercy, when the sick knock on your mega
3:53
church door, you quote me, but you don’t
3:55
follow me. So, no, I’m not angry. I’m
3:59
disappointed. And when judgment day
4:02
comes, don’t look for me at the pulpit
4:04
next to him. I’ll be out back hoping the
4:07
people you turned away. And just so you
4:09
know, he’s not on the guest list.
4:14
Birds are eating my face.
4:22
Leopards are eating my face.
4:30
Birds are eating my face. face.
4:39
The birds are eating my face.

Roger Stone and Richard Nixon Gesture Peace Signs Amid Investigations (PublicSkeleton) draft v1

WASHINGTON (Jan. 25, 2019) — Roger Stone and Richard Nixon Gesture Peace Signs Amid Investigations.

Israeli Company That Helped Build Gaza’s Wall Is Less Sure About Donald Trump’s

[pe2-image src=”https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-OAKNwhCaETI/V65phX7v2bI/AAAAAAAABqQ/nYq6w147Tdc6LFdnyEp7wFqQ6iG9ESa2wCHM/s144-c-o/20160805_1139%2BIsraeli%2BCompany%2BThat%2BHelped%2BBuild%2BGazas%2BWall%2BIs%2BLess%2BSure%2BAbout%2BTrumps.jpg” href=”https://picasaweb.google.com/102930737536139888016/6313942463361513473#6318103349328599474″ caption=”Israeli Company That Helped Build Gaza’s Wall Is Less Sure About Donald Trump’s By Zaid Jilani, TheIntercept.com (August 5, 2016 11:39 a.m.) — AN ISRAEL-BASED SECURITY company that provided intrusion detection technology for the barrier between Israel and the Gaza Strip has offered to help Donald Trump secure the U.S. border — but suggests that building an actual wall along every section of the border is not the way to go.Sa’ar Koursh, the CEO of Magal Security Systems, told Bloomberg News that he would be happy to help Trump. “We would join forces with a major U.S. defense company that has experience with such projects worldwide,” he said. “We’ve done it in the past and we would definitely want to do it.” https://publicskeleton.com/media/2016/08/05/israeli-company-that-helped-build-gazas-wall-is-less-sure-about-donald-trumps/” type=”image” alt=”20160805_1139 Israeli Company That Helped Build Gazas Wall Is Less Sure About Trumps.jpg” ] Israeli Company That Helped Build Gaza’s Wall Is Less Sure About Donald Trump’s
By Zaid Jilani, TheIntercept.com

(August 5, 2016 11:39 a.m.) — AN ISRAEL-BASED SECURITY company that provided intrusion detection technology for the barrier between Israel and the Gaza Strip has offered to help Donald Trump secure the U.S. border — but suggests that building an actual wall along every section of the border is not the way to go.

Sa’ar Koursh, the CEO of Magal Security Systems, told Bloomberg News that he would be happy to help Trump. “We would join forces with a major U.S. defense company that has experience with such projects worldwide,” he said. “We’ve done it in the past and we would definitely want to do it.”

(Read more.)

Young Turks host offers $1M for Trump, Sanders debate

[pe2-image src=”https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-GTCfjlCa7ss/V0hWA-s4MpI/AAAAAAAABRs/PfGiEc0PzBwesoFiJP4IBQP8dVdeyJ4_gCHM/s144-c-o/20160527_0726%2BYoung%2BTurks%2Bhost%2Boffers%2B%25241M%2Bfor%2BTrump%252C%2BSanders%2Bdebate%2B%2528Hill%2529.jpg” href=”https://picasaweb.google.com/102930737536139888016/6280135409876996305#6289371454454117010″ caption=”Young Turks host offers $1M for Trump, Sanders debate By Jesse Byrnes, The Hill (May 27, 2016 7:26 a.m.) — The Young Turks online program is offering up $1 million to host a debate between Democratic hopeful Bernie Sanders and presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump."We are now offering $1 million to charity in order to have that debate," Young Turks host Cenk Uygur said at a dinner at the National Press Club in Washington on Thursday night."This is a very real offer," Uygur said, adding that Trump and Sanders could pick the charity."It is our belief that the Bernie Sanders campaign is already in," Uygur said, adding notices had been sent to both campaigns and the program was waiting to hear back from Trump.(Read more.) https://publicskeleton.com/media/?p=1106″ type=”image” alt=”20160527_0726 Young Turks host offers $1M for Trump, Sanders debate (Hill).jpg” ] Young Turks host offers $1M for Trump, Sanders debate
By Jesse Byrnes, The Hill

(May 27, 2016 7:26 a.m.) — The Young Turks online program is offering up $1 million to host a debate between Democratic hopeful Bernie Sanders and presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump.

“We are now offering $1 million to charity in order to have that debate,” Young Turks host Cenk Uygur said at a dinner at the National Press Club in Washington on Thursday night.

“This is a very real offer,” Uygur said, adding that Trump and Sanders could pick the charity.

“It is our belief that the Bernie Sanders campaign is already in,” Uygur said, adding notices had been sent to both campaigns and the program was waiting to hear back from Trump.

(Read more.)

Trump Hints Going Independent

[pe2-image src=”http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-969Be_E6LKw/VsKiqcavuKI/AAAAAAAAAfg/nmU13WaUqFE/s144-c-o/20160215_1341%252520Donald%252520Trump%252520Floats%252520Idea%252520of%252520a%252520Third-Party%252520Run%252520Again%252520%252528abcnews%252529.jpg” href=”https://picasaweb.google.com/102930737536139888016/Campaign2016#6251738082810247330″ caption=”Donald Trump Floats Idea of a Third-Party Run Againby ABCNews(Feb. 15, 2016 13:41 ET) –At a town hall today in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, Donald Trump floated the idea — without explicitly threatening to do so — that he may run as an independent candidate. https://publicskeleton.com/media/?p=397″ type=”image” alt=”20160215_1341 Donald Trump Floats Idea of a Third-Party Run Again (abcnews).jpg” ] Donald Trump Floats Idea of a Third-Party Run Again
by ABCNews
(Feb. 15, 2016 13:41 ET) –At a town hall today in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, Donald Trump floated the idea — without explicitly threatening to do so — that he may run as an independent candidate.

Trump attacked the Republican National Committee, saying it “better get its act together” and it “does a terrible job.” Trump said he believes the RNC treated him unfairly.

Read more.

Delegate System Stirs Brouhaha After Sanders’ Slam Dunk in New Hampshire

[pe2-image src=”http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-KztVgxJT5vo/Vr0COZEFnHI/AAAAAAAAAX4/ddM6Yq84W-U/s144-c-o/20160211_1507%252520Bernie%252520super%252520delegate%252520panic%252520is%252520based%252520on%252520lazy%252520reporting%252520%252528RawStory%252529.jpg” href=”https://picasaweb.google.com/102930737536139888016/Campaign2016#6250154304129571954″ caption=”(Feb. 11, 2016 16:45 EST)– It appears there is more to the delegate system than meets the eye when calculating who may win the democratic nomination for president in this years primary election cycle between Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. If the brouhaha following Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary is any indication, the Democratic Party’s delegate system has got some voters in an uproar. https://publicskeleton.com/media/?p=291″ type=”image” alt=”20160211_1507 Bernie super delegate panic is based on lazy reporting (RawStory).jpg” ](Feb. 11, 2016 16:45 EST)– It appears there is more to the delegate system than meets the eye when calculating who may win the democratic nomination for president in this year’s primary election cycle between Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

If the brouhaha following Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary is any indication, the Democratic Party’s delegate system has got some voters in an uproar.

Mathematically speaking, there are any number of ways primary state election results can be used to determine the delegate distribution as well as the projected overall standing the candidate may have down the campaign road.

It gets interesting when the superdelegates are taken into consideration, especially when many of which have already pledged their support for Hillary Clinton.

The idea that many delegates have already been spoken for by way of the super-delegate system appears very undemocratic at best. However, when one steps back and reviews the big picture, it is highly unlikely that the democratic party’s super-delegates will cast their final votes against the will of the people’s popular vote.

The effects, however, of the super-delegate system have already made an impact just days after Tuesday’s primary in NH. Even though the projections and tabulations are mere statistical calculations, they can influence the course of people’s attitudes about voting.

This does not play too well with votes who already have the words “rigged-system” at the tips of their tongues mostly due to Sanders’ campaign rhetoric on economic and societal inequality.

How the super-delegate system effects the primary election process during this cycle has yet to be seen. In any case, given how Sanders’ supports already have “rigged-systems” of government processes on their minds, it is expected any election discrepancies will be watched very closely.

superdelegate

A “superdelegate” or an “unpledged delegate” is a delegate to the Democratic National Convention or Republican National Convention that is seated automatically, based on their status as current (Republican and Democratic) or former (Democratic only) party leader or elected official. Other superdelegates are chosen during the primary season. Democratic superdelegates are free to support any candidate for the nomination. This contrasts with convention delegates that are selected based on the party primaries and caucuses in each U.S. state, in which voters choose among candidates for the party’s presidential nomination.

(Source: wikipedia, Accessed Feb. 11, 2016 16:45 EST)

Terms:

Brouhaha
[broo-hah-hah, broo-hah-hah, broo-hah-hah]
noun
1. excited public interest, discussion, or the like, as the clamor attending some sensational event; hullabaloo:

Delegate
noun
1. a person designated to act for or represent another or others; deputy; representative, as in a political convention.

2. A delegate is someone who communicates the ideas of or acts on behalf of an organization at a meeting or conference between organizations of the same level.

Related Stories:

Bernie super delegate panic is based on lazy reporting (Feb. 11, 2016)

New Hampshire primary election results (100% Reporting)

[pe2-image src=”http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-0Snfdq2pXFo/VruW5Dxku0I/AAAAAAAAAW4/JfbG7h9V3aU/s144-c-o/20160210_1445%252520Campaign%2525202016%252520Election%252520Results%252520Online%252520Tool%252520%252528WP%252529.jpg” href=”https://picasaweb.google.com/102930737536139888016/Campaign2016#6249754814916639554″ caption=”Campaign 2016 Election Results Online Tool (Feb 10, 2016 14:45) — This page on the Washington Post's website looks like a good tool to use to get detailed breakdowns of the past and upcoming primary election results.https://publicskeleton.com/media/?p=273″ type=”image” alt=”20160210_1445 Campaign 2016 Election Results Online Tool (WP).jpg” ] New Hampshire primary election results (100% Reporting)

(Feb 10, 2016 14:45) — The New Hampshire primaries are Feb. 9. Delegates at stake: 23 bound for Republicans, 24 pledged for Democrats.

This page on the Washington Post’s website looks like a good tool to use to get detailed breakdowns of the past and upcoming primary election results.

What happened in New Hampshire

Donald Trump resoundingly won the New Hampshire Republican presidential primary, giving the billionaire mogul his first victory in an improbable and brash campaign that already has turned American politics upside down. On the Democratic side, Sen. Bernie Sanders scored a decisive victory in Tuesday’s New Hampshire presidential primary, embarrassing Hillary Clinton in a state she won eight years ago and upending the Democratic nominating contest.

Full story.

New Hampshire primary election results (Approx 90% Reporting)

[pe2-image src=”http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-uC86Rpsu7do/VrrkuozoNjI/AAAAAAAAAVc/Dn6jXT2Qbm0/s144-c-o/20160210_0215%252520New%252520Hampshire%252520primary%252520election%252520results%252520%252528WP%252529.jpg” href=”https://picasaweb.google.com/102930737536139888016/Campaign2016#6249558922809062962″ caption=”New Hampshire primary election results by WashingtonPost.com (Feb. 10, 2016 02:15 EST) — What happened in New Hampshire? Donald Trump resoundingly won the New Hampshire Republican presidential primary. On the Democratic side, Sen. Bernie Sanders scored a decisive victory. https://publicskeleton.com/media/?p=257.” type=”image” alt=”20160210_0215 New Hampshire primary election results (WP).jpg” ] New Hampshire primary election results
by WashingtonPost.com (Feb. 10, 2016 02:15 EST)

What happened in New Hampshire?

Donald Trump resoundingly won the New Hampshire Republican presidential primary, giving the billionaire mogul his first victory in an improbable and brash campaign that already has turned American politics upside down. On the Democratic side, Sen. Bernie Sanders scored a decisive victory in Tuesday’s New Hampshire presidential primary, embarrassing Hillary Clinton in a state she won eight years ago and upending the Democratic nominating contest.

Full Story

Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On TwitterVisit Us On Youtube